May be the Puff Bar Aimed at Reducing the Addiction Potential of ELECTRIC CIGARETTES?
Puff Bar is a great alternative to a normal ice cream treat because it has none of the cons connected with an podsmall.com ice cream treat. Puff Bar is really a simple sweet treat, which makes it a great alternative to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is made with only natural flavors, so it’s a healthy alternative for individuals who are watching their diet. Moreover, Puff Bar is easy to create, you can make it as often as you want without having to prepare the ice cream every time. It’s ideal for kids and for parties because it’s easy to serve.
Puff Bar is really a relatively new product, which was developed to test people a reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. When we smoke we are exposing ourselves to thousands of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar does not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and also has zero calories. The manufacturers declare that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes since it is made from completely 100 % natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.
One of the biggest issues in public areas health today is obesity and diet. Due to this many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these brilliant products, they’re currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar declare that individuals who use their product to lose weight can easily do so when they only need to take with you the tiny product. The makers of Puff Bar know that since public health officials have already been calling for more information on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the public wants to learn about Puff Bar and whether it poses a risk to public health.
By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they’re in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In line with the FDA any e-cigarette that contains nicotine must contain an insert which allows you to put it into your mouth, because of this you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to take it where ever you might go. If the product also offers an extinguisher additionally it is in violation of the law. The reason being that since there is no ash produced by a puff Bar e Cigarette it is not a valid device to utilize to refill an existing e cigarette with nicotine or to smoke another one.
Because the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the companies that produce puff bars claiming that they have marketed their product in a manner that is illegal. In addition to sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request they no longer refer to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the business’s lawyers have suggested that they call it a “tobacco alternative”.
What the legal team did isn’t entirely surprising. The problem with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in the law. This is because there’s currently no law mandating that electric cigarettes need to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could start a flood of lawsuits that would be filed by municipalities that wished to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting type of tobacco into the marketplace.
Plus the possibility of a lawsuit being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes out there could result in a decrease in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research suggests that smokers who are offered non-tobacco flavored e-cigs will replace those cigarettes with those that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to young people and to younger generations, this could substantially reduce the amount of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. Also it seems that the addition of the puff bar to several tobacco-flavored electric cigarettes could lead smokers to seek out “real” cigarettes rather than rely so heavily on an alternative solution that may not provide them with nicotine.
It appears that the UK government could have a point. There’s currently no requirement of tobacco companies to add warning labels on their products nor is there a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The thing that these products all have as a common factor is that they can not cause cancer or other diseases. It appears to be a question of economics that is being overlooked. A solution just like the puff bar would seem such as a much better way to make money for tobacco companies because they are essentially creating products which are more difficult to consume, which in turn means that fewer people will purchase them.